Newsletter
  • Video
    • Thisrupt commentaries
    • Thisrupt Talk
    • Thisruptor
    • Thisrupt History
  • Article
    • Current Affairs
    • Business
    • Society
    • Lifestyle
  • About us
  • Support us
No Result
View All Result
  • Video
    • Thisrupt commentaries
    • Thisrupt Talk
    • Thisruptor
    • Thisrupt History
  • Article
    • Current Affairs
    • Business
    • Society
    • Lifestyle
  • About us
  • Support us
No Result
View All Result
Thisrupt
No Result
View All Result

Which is the higher power, the Constitutional Court or the army?

Voranai VanijakabyVoranai Vanijaka
December 2, 2020
in Current Affairs
Which is the higher power, the Constitutional Court or the army?
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LINEShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

The headline is a bit of a rhetorical question since it was the army, via the Prayut Chan-o-cha military junta, that inspired, oversaw, and approved the 2017 Constitution itself. That’s Thai-style democracy. 

In a regular democracy, however, the answer is obvious, the Constitutional Court is the higher power. Its function is to interpret the laws of the nation. Its duty is to provide justice for the people. 

Today, 2 December, we will find out if there’s any justice left in Thailand. 

The Constitutional Court will deliver the verdict on the legality of General Prayut’s continuous occupancy of an army residence. 

The issue isn’t complicated to understand. 

Unless one would purposely complicate things. 

Put Section 184 and 186.1 of the constitution together, and we have a clear understanding that no MPs, senators, or ministers shall receive any gifts, donations, or presents of any kind from any government agency or anyone else while in office. Conflict of interest is the issue. 

Throw Section 160 at General Prayut, and we also have a violation of “ethical standards.” 

Shove Section 170 into his face, and we have “misconduct that warrants termination from office.” 

But while the constitution is clear, army regulations are also apparent. 

Army regulations stipulate that former army chiefs who continue to be “of service to the nation and the army” may use the residence, courtesy of taxpayers, who didn’t have any say in it. 

However, army regulations don’t specify the case in which the occupier is a government employee, as in the prime minister. 

But that’s neither here nor there. The constitution supersedes army regulations, right? The judges are the higher power in the laws of the land, not military generals, right? 

In an actual democracy, the answers are yes and yes. But in the Thai-style democracy, the last time General Prayut got into trouble with the constitution was his failure to recite the complete oath of office to the Constitutional Court in 2019 when he took office. 

Complaints were filed, but the Constitutional Court merely dismissed them, reasoning that it’s outside of the court’s jurisdiction. 

It’s the quintessential “ain’t got nothing to do with me” argument. 

General Prayut’s defense is this. 

The army residence provides the best security. That’s all. 

Now, if you are familiar with General Prayut’s daily routine, you would understand how serious he is about security. His security detail would make even the US president blush. General Prayut practically has an army to follow him everywhere. 

Why? 

It’s the nature of the junta. What you fear most are two things: 1) Assassination. 2) Counter coup. No security is tighter than those of dictators, former or otherwise. 

Living inside an army base is the best security taxpayers’ money can buy for General Prayut. 

Here’s another point worth noting. 

Is General Prayut still considered “รัฏฐาธิปัตย์” (rat-taa-ti-bpat)? 

The word means “the highest power in the land.” General Prayut was the rat-taa-ti-bpat in his five-plus years of dictatorship rule. Which means he was untouchable and above the law. 

As the rat-taa-ti-bpat, General Prayut could do no wrong in the eye of the law.  

But of course, we are no longer in an outright dictatorship. However, we are not quite in a democracy either. Nonetheless, if the past year-and-half of Thai-style democracy tells us anything, General Prayut still can do no wrong. 

Be that as it may, this doesn’t mean a guilty verdict in the army residence case is an impossibility. Even if General Prayut appointed many of the judges himself. This is Thailand, after all. So it boils down to this: 

A guilty verdict and stripping of his prime ministership mean he’s no longer useful. Anything else that lets him keep his job means he’s still useful. 

And that’s all there is to it. 

Voranai Vanijaka

Voranai Vanijaka

Voranai Vanijaka is a political and social commentator. He’s the recipient of the 2010 Ayumongkol Sonakul Award for his Sunday column, previously in the Bangkok Post Newspaper. He teaches Political Communication and Global Media Industries at Thammasart University and Public Speaking at Webster University. He’s been published in Australia’s Griffith Review, appeared on BBC and ABC, and is a speaker at various forums around the region. He founded Thisrupt.

Related Posts

General Prayut’s playbook: from Red Shirts to Ratsadon
Current Affairs

General Prayut’s playbook: from Red Shirts to Ratsadon

March 9, 2021
In Chiang Mai, it's worrying to see a large number of motorbikes at night without backlights. Thankfully most have functional brake lights, but many have no lights at all, which cause road accidents. Chiang Mai Safe City is a public safety organization concerned with reducing the number of Thai people dying on the roads. When I got my first Thai license, I was happily doing the theory exam, and I got two questions wrong where the answer had broken tail lights. I found out it was legal to drive tanks on Thai streets, but not vehicles without taillights. We all drive on some of the most dangerous roads in the world, with Thailand's road fatalities perennially in the top ten of the United Nation's lists. Even after concerted efforts to reduce the road toll through road safety initiatives, the average daily death toll is more than 60. Statistics from the UN and local traffic reporting sources regularly highlight three factors: 1. Around 75% of all fatalities are people on motorbikes. 2. Around 30% of all accidents involve driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. After 10pm these percentages rise dramatically. We don't need reduced testing. We need more testing and harsher penalties. 3. Only 50% of motorbike riders wear helmets. These figures are alarming, but we are not seeing any significant reductions in recent times except for earlier this year when Thailand was in lockdown and had 10pm to 6am curfews in place. Also, there were no alcohol sales for a week. Many developed countries have responsible alcohol laws, which prohibit sales of alcohol to visibly intoxicated customers. However, in Thailand, the service of alcohol is self-regulated with drink top-ups by table friends. No one knows how much they are consuming before trying to drive or ride home. The Thai Government has had limited success with law enforcement and road safety awareness campaigns. Social media and news outlets regularly show mangled vehicles and lifeless bodies, but we seem desensitized to real effects. We comment RIP, or we use the "sad" emoji, and we get on with scrolling our feeds for the next cute cat picture or celebrity lifestyle picture. Chiang Mai Safe City is a safety initiative proposing a local approach, Thai people helping Thai people. Safety is something everyone can play a part in. Our roads. Our responsibility. We can all tell others if their light is broken, right? Right now, we all need to check our vehicle and motorbike lights. This takes around 30 seconds or less if a friend helps. It's a simple 20 baht five-minute fix at any mechanic. When riding, look around, and someone doesn't have a backlight or brake light, you can simply tell that person, and hopefully, they will listen. We need to reduce Thailand's road fatality statistics. Roads are for everyone to use. Let's make them safer.
Current Affairs

Dear drivers and riders, use your backlights and save lives

December 30, 2020
2020: Khana Ratsadon VS the Chakri Dynasty Part 2
Current Affairs

2020: Khana Ratsadon VS the Chakri Dynasty Part 2

December 29, 2020
Next Post
Why General Prayut will delete the power of the 250 junta-appointed senators

Why General Prayut will delete the power of the 250 junta-appointed senators

Interview: General Prayut can do no wrong

Thisrupt Talk: General Prayut can do no wrong

Why Thailand needs social reengineering before monarchy reform

Why Thailand needs social reengineering before monarchy reform

Follow Thisrupt

  • 38.5k Fans
  • 20.1k Followers
  • 1.2k Followers
  • 1.5k Subscribers

Support us

Click Here to Support Us

Highlights

By the text: How education enslaves the mind and the soul

First came the smoke, then came the monsters

What if Thailand is a former British/French/Dutch/etc colony?

Thailand’s crypto market: let’s have equal opportunity

Parasite the movie: Based on a true story

What is the meaning of news media neutrality?

    Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram

    Thisrupt

    Brutally honest opinion and delicious analysis about what’s happening in Thailand.

    #WhatsHappeningInThailand

    #thisruptdotco

    Newsletter

    © 2020 Thisrupt | Contact

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Video
      • Thisrupt commentaries
      • Thisrupt Talk
      • Thisruptor
      • Thisrupt History
    • Article
      • Current Affairs
      • Business
      • Society
      • Lifestyle
    • About us
    • Support us

    © 2020 Thisrupt | Contact